When Analysis Becomes Evidence: Sound Money Was Not a Prediction — It Was Positioning
- jeter795
- Dec 13, 2025
- 3 min read

December 12, 2025
By Michael A. Jeter
Founder & CEO — Integritas Investment Partners
Strategic Advisor — Integritas CFO Partners International
At the beginning of 2025, our position was clear and unapologetic: the global financial system was entering a repricing phase — not a collapse, but a reset — and gold and silver would be central to that transition.
At the time, this view was still labeled “aggressive,” “early,” or “fringe.”Today, it is simply reality.
The Numbers Speak for Themselves
In January 2025:
Silver traded near $30 per ounce
Gold traded between $3,000–$3,200 per ounce
As of today:
Silver trades at $63–$64 per ounce — a 100%+ increase in under 12 months
Gold trades at $4,200–$4,300 per ounce, well beyond what most institutions forecast for 2026
This did not happen by accident.It happened because the forces we outlined — monetary debasement, sovereign repositioning, physical scarcity, and geopolitical realignment — were already in motion.
Institutional Forecasts vs. Structural Reality
To be clear, large institutions were not blind — they were conservative by design.
Throughout 2024 and early 2025:
Goldman Sachs projected gold in the $3,600–$4,000 range by 2026
J.P. Morgan and others framed upside as gradual, conditional, and volatility-sensitive
Silver forecasts remained restrained, often capped near $45–$50, well beyond the present day
Those forecasts have already been surpassed — in 2025.
This is not a failure of intelligence; it is a function of incentives.
Institutions manage narrative risk. They do not want:
disorderly price spikes
retail-driven fear trading
political scrutiny around inflation signaling
Their role is to smooth transitions, not highlight inflection points early.
Our role is different.
Who We Write For — And Who We Don’t
We do not write for:
short-term traders
volatility chasers
fear-driven speculators
We write for investors seeking:
sovereign security
capital preservation
real assets that outlast policy cycles
quiet conviction, not financial theater
That distinction matters.
Our clients did not chase rallies. They positioned early, sized responsibly, and held through noise.
Proof, Not Performance Theater
Since January 2025:
Silver allocations in accounts we advise have appreciated 60–70%+
Gold allocations have delivered strong absolute gains while reducing portfolio volatility
Balanced, globally aware portfolios outperformed traditional 60/40 structures without leverage or speculation
More importantly: these outcomes aligned almost exactly with the scenarios outlined in our earlier work, including:
Flight to Safety: Gold, Francs, and Balance in a Shifting Global Market
The Gold Awakening: How Strategic Positioning Became Proof, Not Prediction
Our sound-money white papers on remonetization and multipolar reserves
This is not hindsight — it is execution.
Why the Thesis Worked
The thesis was simple:
Debt grows faster than productivity
Confidence erodes before currencies fail
Central banks move before markets acknowledge
Physical assets reprice before paper narratives adjust
Gold and silver are not rising because of fear alone. They are rising because trust is being re-anchored.
Central banks are not buying gold emotionally — they are buying it strategically. Industrial users are not stockpiling silver speculatively — they are securing supply.
That distinction is everything.
Sound Money Is No Longer Fringe
The idea that gold and silver are “risky” belongs to a dollar-centric world that no longer exists.
Today:
BRICS settlement architecture is evolving
Neutral currencies like the Swiss franc are quietly outperforming
Physical commodities are reclaiming their role as collateral, not curiosities
What was once considered defensive is now foundational.
Final Thought: This Was Never About Being Right
This was never about calling tops, bottoms, or headlines.
It was about:
seeing structural shifts early
positioning with discipline
holding through engineered volatility
preserving purchasing power while others debated narratives
Sound money did not suddenly “win.” It simply did what it has always done when trust shifts.
The only difference this time is that the evidence arrived faster than expected.
And for those who positioned early, quietly, and intentionally —the proof is now undeniable.





Comments